Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03968
Original file (BC 2013 03968.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-03968

	XXXXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 30 May 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) diagnosed on 13 Jun 13, he was unable to successfully obtain a minimum passing score on the cardio component of the contested FA.

In support of the appeal, the applicant submits 13 Jun 13 and 8 Jul 13 medical records and AF Form 469 (13 Jun 13).

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of master sergeant (E-7).

On 30 May 13, applicant participated in the contested FA and attained an unsatisfactory score (37.00) completing all four components.

On 13 Jun 13 (14 days following contested FA), he saw PCM concerning problems staying asleep/shortness of breath and on 8 Jul 13 was finally diagnosed with COPD.  AF Form 469 dated 13 Jun 13 restricts the applicant from running or walking in FAs till 13 Aug 13.

A similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant should not have completed the FA due to injury.  Although the applicant’s injury was validated, there was no indication the commander invalidated the FA.

The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows:

Date 
Composite Score
Rating
29 Aug 13
95.75
Excellent (Exempt from Cardio)
*30 May 13
37.00
Unsatisfactory (0 Points for Cardio)
29 Nov 12
76.30
Satisfactory
5 May 12
84.90
Satisfactory
5 Jan 12
98.50
Excellent (Exempt from Cardio)

* Contested FA

In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_AFGM5 (3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, Paragraph b, “If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury and provides supporting medical documentation, the Unit Commander may invalidate the FA results by notifying the FAC in writing. If the FA is invalidated, the Airman will be required to retest on all non-exempt FA components within five duty days from original FA test date. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional five duty days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided. Non-AGR and Traditional ARC Airmen will be required to retest the next date they are in appropriate military duty status and official FAs are being conducted. NOTE: Original FA will count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.”

In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2., “All members must complete the FSQ prior to FA (Attachment 4).”

In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Attachment 4, Fitness Screening Questionnaire:  
“1. Have you experienced any of the symptoms/problems listed below and not been medically evaluated and cleared for unrestricted participation in a physical training program?
- Unexplained chest discomfort with or without exertion
- Unusual or unexplained shortness of breath
- Dizziness, fainting, or blackouts associated with exertion
- Other medical problems that may prevent you from safely participating in this test
     - Yes: Stop. Notify your UFPM and contact your PCP/MLO for evaluation/ recommendations (or for ARC, contact the MLO for Duty Limiting Conditions (DLC) documentation and referral to PCP).”

________________________________________________________________




AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial and states, in part, the applicant did not provide documentation of an invalidation memorandum from the unit commander.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days. 

As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant partial relief.  After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we partially agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that insufficient evidence exists to support removal of the entire FA.  However, we recognize that the applicant did have a medical condition and the cardio component of the contested FA should be changed to reflect an “Exempt” status.  In this respect, we note the applicant provided medical documentation indicating he was diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 14 days after the contested FA and are inclined to believe that it affected his ability to pass the cardio component of the FA.  In view of the applicant’s medical condition and noting his passing scores on all other components of the contested FA, we find a totality of the evidence supports favorable consideration of this portion of his request.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________




THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio component of the Fitness Assessment, dated 30 May 13 be amended in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS) to reflect “Exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System.
________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03968 in Executive Session on 30 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Ms. XXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
	Ms. XXXXXXXXX, Member
	Ms. XXXXXXXXX, Member


All members voted to correct the records, as recommended partial relief.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

		Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 23 Aug 12, w/atchs.
		Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 3 Jan 14, w/atchs.
		Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Feb 14.




                                   XXXXXXXXX
                                   Panel Chair


   



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01802

    Original file (BC 2013 01802.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last eight FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 13 Nov 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) 9 May 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) *25 Mar 13 33.33 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from PU) *12 Dec 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 28 Jun 12 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) *19 Mar 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 2 Aug 11 84.70 Satisfactory 28 Apr 11 77.90 Unsatisfactory (minimum SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04196

    Original file (BC 2013 04196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Recommend invalidation of FA in question.” A similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant should not have completed the FA due to injury. NOTE: Original FA will count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.” In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2., “All members must complete the FSQ prior to FA (Attachment 4).” In accordance with guidance at the time of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03162

    Original file (BC 2013 03162.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score AC Component Rating 11 Jun 13 Exempt Exempt Exempt all four categories *29 May 13 0.0 36.00”/0.00 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 29 Oct 12 85.50 32.50”/17.10 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 23 Apr 12 100.00 31.00”/20.00 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 31 Oct 11 79.50 33.50”/15.90 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03506

    Original file (BC 2013 03506.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 Apr 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained an unsatisfactory score (37.00) completing all four components. If the FA is invalidated, the Airman will be required to retest on all non-exempt FA components within five duty days from original FA test date. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04146

    Original file (BC 2013 04146.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant did not provide any documentation describing the injury and why he could not pass the contested FAs. If the FA is invalidated, the Airman will be required to retest on all non-exempt FA components within five duty days from original FA test date. NOTE: Original FA will count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.” In accordance with guidance at the time of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01688

    Original file (BC 2013 01688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last six FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 3 Mar 14 85.00 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 9 Sep 13 96.38 Excellent (Exempt from PU/SU) 7 Mar 13 87.63 Satisfactory (Exempt from PU/SU) 11 Sep 12 82.00 Satisfactory (Exempt from PU/SU) 30 Apr 12 82.00 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) *31 Jan 12 72.63 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from PU/SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_AFGM3 (3 Jan 12),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01755

    Original file (BC 2013 01755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For non-AGR ARC, Airmen will be required to retest the next date they are in appropriate military duty status and official FAs are being conducted.” In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2., “All members must complete the FSQ prior to FA (Attachment 4).” In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2.1, “The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days (90 days for ARC), but...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05833

    Original file (BC 2013 05833.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After the FA the applicant visited his medical provider and was given a corrected profile. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to void/remove the FA dated 25 Jan 13. While the AFI does state that a member who is using albuterol medication should be exempt on the walk component, the applicant did not provide justification that would prove he was taking the medication at the time of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02767

    Original file (BC 2014 02767.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides a Memorandum from his medical provider dated 19 Mar 13 indicating he had a medical condition that precluded his passing the non-exempt portion of the test. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04714

    Original file (BC 2013 04714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also provided a memorandum from the medical provider dated 01 Jul 13, that validated he had a medical condition that precluded him from passing the 19 Jun 13 FA and then was issued an AF Form 469. In regards to the FA dated 19 Jun 13, we recognize the letter from his medical provider, which states that a medical condition prevented him from passing. Furthermore, the applicant contends that since the FAs dated 31 July 12 and 28 Dec 12 now reflect a passing score in AFFMS and the FAs...